An important component of culture is the language that a
group uses. I am not referring to just
the type of language spoken (i.e. English, Spanish, etc.), but also the
specific vocabulary and social intent that is connected with the group or
institution. Each group tends to have
its own jargon. For example, if you work
in special education, you need to be familiar with concepts like IEPs,
benchmarks and goals, and scaffolding.
Clinicians who work in hospitals need to understand the names of
procedures and the labels and roles of different members of the team. One study participant commented how parents
were re-identified. She indicated how
the parent of a child in the hospital typically became known as “mom” or
“dad”—identified by their role as opposed to their name or individual
identity.
As with all elements of culture, language shows
us something about the beliefs and values of the group or setting. For example, special education is very much
driven by the need to use legal frameworks and guides such as the
Individualized Education Program (IEP) to establish educational and therapeutic
programming for children with special needs.
In the hospital setting, however, there is a team that surrounds the
sick child and each member of that team has a role. In both examples, the music therapist must
develop an understanding of the culture of the institution and how to best work
within that system. One study participant
indicated, “There are many things that are not spoken.” It is therefore up to the clinician to take
time to not only learn the vocabulary of the group, but also be a careful
observer about the communicative intent in order to best understand the role of
music therapy within that structure. The
study participant above reflected on her transition from a special education
type of setting to a hospital setting when she indicated, “I found that I
really had to tie into my humanness and my intuition and my sensitivities as a
person more than a set of tools or songs or concrete things.” She had to learn the expectations of the new
group through their language. She had to
re-learn her way of being as a clinician.
Sunday, June 17, 2012
The Language of a Group: Implications for Clinical Music Therapy Practices
I am currently working on a study to explore the
implications of family and institutional practices of different groups of
clinical music therapy practice. These
practices make up the local culture.
While some music therapists are employed by one agency and strictly
serve one type of clientele, many music therapists provide contractual services
for multiple agencies or work within institutions that such as hospitals or
community agencies that provide services for people from a wide range of
backgrounds and experiences.
Labels:
institutional culture,
language,
music therapy
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Studying Cultural Behaviors: Insights into Development and Learning
I find myself in the midst of a few very different qualitative
research studies. One study is examining
the implications of family and institutional culture on music therapy practices. Another study is examining how families
interact with a local institution of informal learning. The third study is looking at how
individuals, as informed by their contexts, are navigating a new context. While the populations are very different for
these three studies (music therapists, families/ caregivers with young
children, and college students), the central question that threads through all
of the studies is the idea of how an individual’s local context shapes their
experiences, transitions, and learning.
So, what is the value of studying the common place? I believe it’s about really seeing what is right in front of us. I just finished teaching a child development course. Students in the class were required to complete a child observation paper which included 4-5 hours of direct observation of a child or group of children. Typically, students will select children that are familiar to them (i.e. cousins, friend’s children or even younger siblings) out of convenience. By the end of the project, students often report seeing things in the child that they never noticed before. In some cases, the transformation in their perception of the child is so significant. They shift from seeing the child just as this loud, obnoxious child to really seeing how their behaviors are shaped by numerous factors. The students use developmental theory to guide their interpretations of the children’s behaviors so the commonplace becomes a point of insight and understanding.
Overall, these studies represent an exploration of cultural
variables on a more micro level. Rather
than examining culture related to larger ethnic or geographic variables, these
studies are an attempt to examine culture for day to day experiences. In a previous entry, I shared Spradley’s definition
that culture is the knowledge that allows us to interpret and engage in social
behavior. Each of these studies therefore
attempts to examine the nature of the cultural knowledge and how that knowledge
guides behaviors and learning.
What is the value of this sort of examination? Why is it beneficial to examine the everyday
lived experience? In a recent
conversation with a research colleague, we were discussing the perception of a
researcher from the hard sciences who claimed that examining the everyday occurrences
is just looking at what is common knowledge.
The researcher did not see the value in studying what is known. Last night, I was reading a passage by Geertz
in which he was talking about the nature of studying culture. He was describing the importance of
theoretical formulations in the interpretation of cultural behaviors. Geertz claims that, “stated independently of
their applications, they seem either commonplace or vacant” (p. 25).So, what is the value of studying the common place? I believe it’s about really seeing what is right in front of us. I just finished teaching a child development course. Students in the class were required to complete a child observation paper which included 4-5 hours of direct observation of a child or group of children. Typically, students will select children that are familiar to them (i.e. cousins, friend’s children or even younger siblings) out of convenience. By the end of the project, students often report seeing things in the child that they never noticed before. In some cases, the transformation in their perception of the child is so significant. They shift from seeing the child just as this loud, obnoxious child to really seeing how their behaviors are shaped by numerous factors. The students use developmental theory to guide their interpretations of the children’s behaviors so the commonplace becomes a point of insight and understanding.
Careful examination of everyday behaviors as guided by
theoretical formulations allows for deeper interpretation and
understanding. This process can
drastically alter the way that we understand others and how we interact with
them. I believe this is the value of the
commonplace.
Geertz, C. (1973).
The Interpretation of Cultures.
New York, NY: Basic Books. Sunday, May 20, 2012
Knowledge is Indeed Precious
Last week, PBS aired a film entitled Precious Knowledge. This
film highlighted a program in ethnic studies in the Tucson, AZ high schools
which focused on Latino students and their rich histories. The curriculum program was born out the need
to support students with historically high drop-out rates who have been failed
by standard educational programming.
The film features bright, articulate students who talk about
a sense of finding their identity. The
students were empowered to believe that they could shape their own destiny
rather than being controlled by stereotypes and limitations.
Unfortunately, the story
took a bitter turn when the classes were swept up into the politics of a state
that appears to be bent on controlling populations of people through scare tactics
and legislation. In 2011, the Arizona
lawmakers passed legislation that effectively abolished the ethnic studies
classes. The more faculty and students
tried to express their voices, the more there were labeled as radicals who were
intent on overthrowing the government.
This poignant story underscores the importance of examining
public institutions and policies that try to control parts of the population
for their own good. It is imperative that we look closely at our
own lens and think about how our individual reactions shape the experiences of
all of the individuals we work with whether they are students, clients or
co-workers. Are we creating a place for
people find their voice or are we part of the efforts to control?
One of the courses that I regularly teach is an introduction
to special education course. Students who
enroll in the course plan to become teachers in special education, elementary
education, early childhood education or related human service fields. At the end of the course, I challenge
students by encouraging them to think about how they can become advocates for
persons with disabilities. I explain how
advocacy can range from monitoring our own language and using language that is
culturally and contextually sensitive, to learning more about different groups
through active inquiry, to volunteering our time to serve others, to speaking
up on the behalf of others.
Watching Precious
Knowledge brought the message of advocacy right home. We can all be advocates. We can all take a stand through our
behaviors, beliefs and attitudes. Most
importantly, we can open our minds to knowledge from the world around us which
can be truly precious.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
The Autism Community: Coming Together for Change
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
approximately 1 in 88 children will be diagnosed with an autism spectrum
disorder. The increased incidence of
autism and related disorders is astounding.
When I started working as a music therapist in the early 90s, the
prevalence figures were much less. There
were fewer supports for individuals with autism and their families. More families had a sense of isolation.
With the increase of the incidence of autism, there is also
an increase in the number of individuals and families impacted by this lifelong
disability. Early this morning, I
volunteered for the Autism Speaks walk in Chicago. Hundreds of volunteers, numerous organizations,
and thousands of individuals with autism and their families and friends all
convened at Soldier Field in Chicago to respond to the need to bring attention
and dollars to this very important cause.
As with many charity walks, people form teams. The teams make t-shirts and carry signs in
support of their friend of family member with autism. Some of the teams were 50+ members
strong. It was wonderful seeing so many
people rally around individuals and their families. Families that many years ago would likely
have felt very much alone are now surrounded with their friends and
family. Families are now surrounded by organizations
and a promise for resources that will lead to on-going research and support.
There has been a dramatic change in the autism community
over the years that is representative of the larger changes in disability
culture. There is a tone of empowerment
and a demand for continued change. The
people that will see the benefit of this cultural shift are the many
individuals with autism spectrum disorders.
New Data on Autism Spectrum Disorders. (March 29, 2012). Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved
from http://www.cdc.gov/Features/CountingAutism/
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Race and Culture
In one of my classes we recently watched the HBO
Documentary, Little Rock Central: 50
Years Later (2007). This powerful
documentary juxtaposes the school’s history with current challenges. Over 50 years ago, this school was the focus
on tremendous conflict because of the forced segregation of nine African
American students during the height of the Civil Rights Movement. The segregation was representative of the
conflict of long standing racial beliefs and demands for change. Fifty years later, things have changed and
yet they have stayed the same. The
documentary shows that although the African American population is now the
majority group at the school students of color continue to be marginalized in
many ways. Students and teachers talk
about the barriers for African American students to be involved in advanced
placement classes or other achievement oriented school activities. African American students at Little Rock
Central are more likely to be in remedial education or struggling with multiple
socio-economic and family challenges.
One of the most compelling scenes of the film is when one of
the Little Rock Nine, Minnijean Brown,
speaks to a group of current students.
Ms. Brown talks with the group of students about their own
self-segregation within the classroom.
Several students claim that they are just sitting by people they know or
one person cannot truly make a difference.
Ms. Brown tells the students that they are not making choices. Their behaviors demonstrate a set of societal
standards. This scene is striking
because we see a woman who engaged in such a courageous act as a teenager
confront students who live under an assumption that they don’t have the power
to change anything.
The documentary is interesting and provocative on many
levels. The story shows how the culture
of the local institution is shaped in such a dramatic manner by larger social
and legal issues. The film also shows in
dramatic fashion how culture leads to patterns of thinking that are very
ingrained into individual beliefs.
Minnijean Brown reminds us that one person can make a
difference. Her story demonstrates the
importance of breaking out of stereotypes.
Her story reminds us all to examine our own belief systems. Are we just playing out long standing
societal patterns? Are we aware of our
own cultural context?
Little Rock Central:
50 Years Later. (2007). HBO Films
Scene: Minnijean Brown talks to a group of current students http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8Or8OBrMzg
Labels:
cultural awareness,
institutional culture,
race
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Changing Cultural Practices: Music Therapy and Autism Spectrum Disorders
I was delighted to attend the Great Lakes Region of AMTA Music Therapy Conference this weekend. I shared a presentation entitled, “Examining Cultural Practices and Contexts of Development: Implications for Clinical Music Therapy Practices”. The presentation highlighted many of the ideas that I have been sharing in this blog and explored how ideas about culture and development shape clinical practices.
I shared Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model of development as a guiding framework for the presentation. His model emphasizes how each individual’s development is shaped by multiple layers of influence. In short, we are never working with a client in isolation. Each client is uniquely shaped by his or her family, community, prior experiences, ethnic identity, and larger social and political issues of the day. Even the time at which an individual develops shapes his or her developmental trajectory.
I worked with individuals with autism spectrum disorders throughout my career as a music therapist. When I first entered the field there was very limited information available and the prevalence figures seemed to be a few individuals in 1,000. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released updated prevalence figures that indicate that 1 in 88 children are diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. These numbers are absolutely shocking. In addition to the increased numbers, there is also a dramatic increase in the information available about autism and approaches for treatment and support.
Knowledge and beliefs change over time. It is more likely now, that children with autism spectrum disorders will be accurately diagnosed and connected with appropriate services. Music therapists and other clinicians can access a wealth of research and first person narratives to better understand how to best serve a client with autism. Living at this time creates a unique set of circumstances which will impact the development of each person.
Changes in the autism community represent one example of changes in culture. These changes have tremendous implications for families, schools, communities, health care, legal systems, and larger social structures. Additionally, these changes have tremendous implications for music therapists and other clinicians.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press.
“New Data on Autism Spectrum Disorders”. ( March 29, 2012). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/Features/CountingAutism/.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Integration of Cultural Ideas
The process of identifying with a cultural perspective is not the same for every person. Spiro (as cited in D’Andrade & Strauss, 1992) defined the internalization of cultural models according to four distinct levels:
· 1st level: person is acquainted with cultural norms, but may be indifferent or even reject some norms
· 2nd level: cultural beliefs are acquired as clichés; people wear the banner, but don’t fully integrate the belief
· 3rd level: the cultural information becomes part of the person’s belief system in a genuine way
· 4th level: the cultural system is internalized and salient; the individual holds the ideas with both beliefs and emotions
With the opening day of the baseball season just about a week away, it’s easy to imagine these levels of integration. Baseball fans engage with their favorite teams on a variety of levels. Many casual fans may listen for the reporting of score on the local news and occasionally attend a game. The “die hard” fans, however, follow the team closely and sincerely believe that “this will be the year”. I would put my grandfather in the second group—the “die hard” fan. I remember him listening to games on his radio and going to games with his score card in hand. When he wasn’t watching his favorite professional team, he was on the ball fields in his town supporting local youth and teaching them the love of the game.
Spiro’s model reminds us that just because a person has an association with a group we cannot assume his or her level of internalization of the cultural models of the group. Teachers and clinicians may find it valuable to learn some of the cultural values and traditions of the students and clients they are serving, but it’s important not to assume that every person with that group shares the same knowledge or integration of that knowledge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
