An important component of culture is the language that a
group uses. I am not referring to just
the type of language spoken (i.e. English, Spanish, etc.), but also the
specific vocabulary and social intent that is connected with the group or
institution. Each group tends to have
its own jargon. For example, if you work
in special education, you need to be familiar with concepts like IEPs,
benchmarks and goals, and scaffolding.
Clinicians who work in hospitals need to understand the names of
procedures and the labels and roles of different members of the team. One study participant commented how parents
were re-identified. She indicated how
the parent of a child in the hospital typically became known as “mom” or
“dad”—identified by their role as opposed to their name or individual
identity.
As with all elements of culture, language shows
us something about the beliefs and values of the group or setting. For example, special education is very much
driven by the need to use legal frameworks and guides such as the
Individualized Education Program (IEP) to establish educational and therapeutic
programming for children with special needs.
In the hospital setting, however, there is a team that surrounds the
sick child and each member of that team has a role. In both examples, the music therapist must
develop an understanding of the culture of the institution and how to best work
within that system. One study participant
indicated, “There are many things that are not spoken.” It is therefore up to the clinician to take
time to not only learn the vocabulary of the group, but also be a careful
observer about the communicative intent in order to best understand the role of
music therapy within that structure. The
study participant above reflected on her transition from a special education
type of setting to a hospital setting when she indicated, “I found that I
really had to tie into my humanness and my intuition and my sensitivities as a
person more than a set of tools or songs or concrete things.” She had to learn the expectations of the new
group through their language. She had to
re-learn her way of being as a clinician.
Sunday, June 17, 2012
The Language of a Group: Implications for Clinical Music Therapy Practices
I am currently working on a study to explore the
implications of family and institutional practices of different groups of
clinical music therapy practice. These
practices make up the local culture.
While some music therapists are employed by one agency and strictly
serve one type of clientele, many music therapists provide contractual services
for multiple agencies or work within institutions that such as hospitals or
community agencies that provide services for people from a wide range of
backgrounds and experiences.
Labels:
institutional culture,
language,
music therapy
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Studying Cultural Behaviors: Insights into Development and Learning
I find myself in the midst of a few very different qualitative
research studies. One study is examining
the implications of family and institutional culture on music therapy practices. Another study is examining how families
interact with a local institution of informal learning. The third study is looking at how
individuals, as informed by their contexts, are navigating a new context. While the populations are very different for
these three studies (music therapists, families/ caregivers with young
children, and college students), the central question that threads through all
of the studies is the idea of how an individual’s local context shapes their
experiences, transitions, and learning.
So, what is the value of studying the common place? I believe it’s about really seeing what is right in front of us. I just finished teaching a child development course. Students in the class were required to complete a child observation paper which included 4-5 hours of direct observation of a child or group of children. Typically, students will select children that are familiar to them (i.e. cousins, friend’s children or even younger siblings) out of convenience. By the end of the project, students often report seeing things in the child that they never noticed before. In some cases, the transformation in their perception of the child is so significant. They shift from seeing the child just as this loud, obnoxious child to really seeing how their behaviors are shaped by numerous factors. The students use developmental theory to guide their interpretations of the children’s behaviors so the commonplace becomes a point of insight and understanding.
Overall, these studies represent an exploration of cultural
variables on a more micro level. Rather
than examining culture related to larger ethnic or geographic variables, these
studies are an attempt to examine culture for day to day experiences. In a previous entry, I shared Spradley’s definition
that culture is the knowledge that allows us to interpret and engage in social
behavior. Each of these studies therefore
attempts to examine the nature of the cultural knowledge and how that knowledge
guides behaviors and learning.
What is the value of this sort of examination? Why is it beneficial to examine the everyday
lived experience? In a recent
conversation with a research colleague, we were discussing the perception of a
researcher from the hard sciences who claimed that examining the everyday occurrences
is just looking at what is common knowledge.
The researcher did not see the value in studying what is known. Last night, I was reading a passage by Geertz
in which he was talking about the nature of studying culture. He was describing the importance of
theoretical formulations in the interpretation of cultural behaviors. Geertz claims that, “stated independently of
their applications, they seem either commonplace or vacant” (p. 25).So, what is the value of studying the common place? I believe it’s about really seeing what is right in front of us. I just finished teaching a child development course. Students in the class were required to complete a child observation paper which included 4-5 hours of direct observation of a child or group of children. Typically, students will select children that are familiar to them (i.e. cousins, friend’s children or even younger siblings) out of convenience. By the end of the project, students often report seeing things in the child that they never noticed before. In some cases, the transformation in their perception of the child is so significant. They shift from seeing the child just as this loud, obnoxious child to really seeing how their behaviors are shaped by numerous factors. The students use developmental theory to guide their interpretations of the children’s behaviors so the commonplace becomes a point of insight and understanding.
Careful examination of everyday behaviors as guided by
theoretical formulations allows for deeper interpretation and
understanding. This process can
drastically alter the way that we understand others and how we interact with
them. I believe this is the value of the
commonplace.
Geertz, C. (1973).
The Interpretation of Cultures.
New York, NY: Basic Books.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)