Overall, these studies represent an exploration of cultural
variables on a more micro level. Rather
than examining culture related to larger ethnic or geographic variables, these
studies are an attempt to examine culture for day to day experiences. In a previous entry, I shared Spradley’s definition
that culture is the knowledge that allows us to interpret and engage in social
behavior. Each of these studies therefore
attempts to examine the nature of the cultural knowledge and how that knowledge
guides behaviors and learning.
What is the value of this sort of examination? Why is it beneficial to examine the everyday
lived experience? In a recent
conversation with a research colleague, we were discussing the perception of a
researcher from the hard sciences who claimed that examining the everyday occurrences
is just looking at what is common knowledge.
The researcher did not see the value in studying what is known. Last night, I was reading a passage by Geertz
in which he was talking about the nature of studying culture. He was describing the importance of
theoretical formulations in the interpretation of cultural behaviors. Geertz claims that, “stated independently of
their applications, they seem either commonplace or vacant” (p. 25).So, what is the value of studying the common place? I believe it’s about really seeing what is right in front of us. I just finished teaching a child development course. Students in the class were required to complete a child observation paper which included 4-5 hours of direct observation of a child or group of children. Typically, students will select children that are familiar to them (i.e. cousins, friend’s children or even younger siblings) out of convenience. By the end of the project, students often report seeing things in the child that they never noticed before. In some cases, the transformation in their perception of the child is so significant. They shift from seeing the child just as this loud, obnoxious child to really seeing how their behaviors are shaped by numerous factors. The students use developmental theory to guide their interpretations of the children’s behaviors so the commonplace becomes a point of insight and understanding.
Careful examination of everyday behaviors as guided by
theoretical formulations allows for deeper interpretation and
understanding. This process can
drastically alter the way that we understand others and how we interact with
them. I believe this is the value of the
commonplace.
Geertz, C. (1973).
The Interpretation of Cultures.
New York, NY: Basic Books.
No comments:
Post a Comment